Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 01:13

Just in the last 5 years:
Thank you.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Elden Ring Nightreign Is Getting An Official Hardcover Strategy Guide - GameSpot
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What’s next?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
What do you think of the Quora group "It's Ok to Be White" for people who are proud of being white?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Cleveland issues public health alert after spike in COVID-19 detected in wastewater - Cleveland.com
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Totam aut neque cum voluptas velit eum tempore.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ground beef sold at national grocery chain might be contaminated with E. coli, USDA warns - AL.com